Cleveland Fire Brigade (24 020 738)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Mar 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way a vehicle owned by the Authority, was being driven on a road, by one of its employees. This is because there is another body better placed to look at Mr X’s complaint.

The complaint

  1. Mr X was unhappy about the way a fire service vehicle was being driven on a road. He said because of the way it was being driven he had to take evasive action. Mr X said the vehicle was being driven dangerously and this caused him alarm and distress.
  2. Mr X was also unhappy with how his complaint was handled and he wants all those involved to receive training.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X said he was unhappy because he had to take evasive action when he encountered a fire service vehicle on the road. He made a complaint to a call handler about this, and he was also unhappy with how the staff handling his complaint treated him, saying they dealt with him in a dismissive manner.
  2. We will not investigate this complaint. The Police Service are better suited to consider Mr X’s complaint about how a vehicle was being driven on a road, and whether the manner of driving is in contravention of road traffic legislation.
  3. Nor will we consider Mr X’s complaint about complaint handling. It is not a good use of our resources to consider complaint handling, where we are not looking at the substantive issue.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the Police Service are better suited to investigate allegations of dangerous driving.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings