London Borough of Hillingdon (24 011 572)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council failing to respond to information requests. The Information Commissioners Office is better placed to deal with the complaint.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained that since a previous complaint to the Ombudsman, the Council has not responded to her information requests.
  2. Mrs X says this has caused her distress and she has had to leave her job.
  3. Mrs X wants the Council employees not to abuse their power over residents.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The Information Commissioner's Office considers complaints about freedom of information. Its decision notices may be appealed to the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights). So where we receive complaints about freedom of information, we normally consider it reasonable to expect the person to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner.
  3. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X complained about how the Council dealt with her freedom of information and subject access requests.
  2. We cannot investigate Mrs X complaint about her freedom of information request as she has used her right of appeal to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO).
  3. Mrs X has complained to the ICO about the Council’s response to her data protection subject access request. The ICO is better placed to deal with such complaints.
  4. The distress Mrs X referred to in her complaint, caused by not getting the information she has requested, is not separable from the issues she has referred to the ICO.
  5. It is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures, if we are unable to deal with the substantive issue.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because she has used her right of appeal to the ICO. And it is better placed to consider her data protection complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings