Medway Council (24 008 659)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 25 Sep 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about a data breach. This is because complaints about data matters, such as this, are best considered by the Information Commissioner’s Office.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains the Council committed a data breach in sharing his personal information with his abusive ex-partner during a telephone call.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  3. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council that it committed a data breach when it shared his personal information with his ex-partner during a telephone call.
  2. The Council said none of Mr X’s personal information was shared during the telephone call and it found no evidence of a data breach. It signposted Mr X to the Information Commissioner’s Office if he remained dissatisfied with its final response and wished to pursue the matter further.
  3. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because this is a matter best considered by the Information Commissioner’s Office as it is the body set up to consider data matters such as this. The Council has correctly signposted Mr X to that office. We will not also consider it.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is about a data matter best considered by the Information Commissioner’s Office.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings