Fylde Borough Council (24 006 742)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 06 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s record keeping as it does not cause the complainant sufficient injustice to warrant our further involvement.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council failed to keep records of meetings with a developer around drainage issues. Mr X considers this puts a number of properties at increased risk of flooding. Mr X also complains the Council failed to properly deal with the complaint he subsequently made about this. Mr X says he was caused frustration by this, and he would like the Council to implement protocols to ensure meeting records are kept and to provide answers to his queries.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. While Mr X says he is concerned that a number of properties will be more prone to flooding, he gives no indication that this may impact his own property. In addition, such concerns are speculative and would not provide grounds for us to investigate, as per paragraph two. Any increased flood risk could not be said in any case to arise from Mr X’s specific complaint to us, that is, the standard of the Council’s record keeping alone.
  2. I recognise that Mr X is also unhappy about the way the Council dealt with his complaint, but we will not investigate this as a stand alone issue when we will not investigate the substantive matter.
  3. For these reasons, we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he is not caused sufficient personal injustice from it to warrant our further involvement.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings