Kingston Upon Hull City Council (24 006 284)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 25 Jul 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X says the Council is using exemptions under information rights laws to prevent public scrutiny in the complaints process. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because the Information Commissioner is best placed to investigate. Further, there is no fault in the Council not considering Mr X’s matters via its complaints process.

The complaint

  1. In summary, Mr X says the Council is improperly relying on exemptions under information rights laws to avoid scrutiny via its complaints process.
  2. While Mr X accepts this would usually be a matter for the Information Commissioner (ICO), he considers the ensuing lack of transparency and public accountability places it within the Ombudsman’s remit.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide:
  • there is another body better placed to consider this complaint.
  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X’s complaint was triggered by concerns and queries about what was written in his child’s records. The Council has refused to release aspects of those records to Mr X and/ or answer his detailed queries. We will not investigate as the Information Commissioner is the most suitable body to consider if the Council use of exemptions is appropriate.
  2. Mr X’s complaint is not one for the complaints process as it is a matter for the ICO. So there is no fault by the Council in not placing Mr X’s concerns through its complaints procedure.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the Information Commissioner is best placed to consider. And there is no fault by the Council not considering via its complaints procedure.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings