Lancashire Fire & Rescue Service (24 003 681)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Dec 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Authority’s actions relating to a Fire Risk Assessment. It was reasonable for him to take the matter to court.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Authority’s actions relating to a Fire Risk Assessment. He says the Authority gave him conflicting information and their actions eventually forced him to close his business.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  3. We have the power to start or end an investigation into a complaint about actions the law allows us to investigate. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we think the issues could reasonably be, or have been mentioned as part of the legal proceedings regarding a closely related matter. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Authority conducted a Fire Risk Assessment at Mr X’s business premises in May 2023. It identified several issues that needed to be addressed. Mr X says the Authority gave him conflicting advice about whether he should start the remedial works.
  2. In June 2023, the Authority issued him with a restriction notice, restricting use of part of the premises, and an enforcement notice which stated he had three months to rectify the issues they had found.
  3. We will not investigate this complaint. If Mr X disagreed with these notices and wished to challenge them, it was reasonable for him to take the matter to court. If he considered the Authority’s actions prior to the issuing of the notices affected the validity of the notices, he could have raised this as part of the court proceedings.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it was reasonable for him to take the matter to court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings