Liverpool City Council (23 000 321)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 25 Apr 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a solar panel scheme as the injustice caused to Mr X does not arise from Council fault.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains he was misled that a solar panel scheme was backed by the Council as marketing material he received was signed off as being sent by it. Mr X signed up for the scheme and had solar panels installed but has an issue with the installation. Mr X wants the Council to report the company to the police for misusing its name or to accept responsibility.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained or we can achieve no meaningful outcome for the complainant (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I recognise that Mr X feels he was misled as he received marketing emails that were signed off as being sent by the Council. However, the Council is not involved in the solar panel scheme in question, it is an initiative launched by the Liverpool City Region Combined Authority. The injustice Mr X claims therefore does not arise directly from the Council itself. Mr X’s complaints are best directed to the scheme/installer.
  2. If Mr X considers criminal activities have taken place, then he can report this matter himself to the police. Mr X can also seek recourse via Trading Standards.
  3. For these reasons, we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the injustice he claims is linked to the actions of bodies other than the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings