Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council (22 011 572)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 15 Dec 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Mrs X’s request for her late father’s social care records. The Information Commissioner’s Office is best placed to consider requests for information made under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained the Council has delayed responding to her request for her late father’s social care records, which she has been asking for since April 2021. This has caused Mrs X distress. She wants the Council to share the records with her so she can gain clarity about her father’s care leading up to his death.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Information Commissioner's Office considers complaints about freedom of information. Its decision notices may be appealed to the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights). So where we receive complaints about freedom of information, we normally consider it reasonable to expect the person to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X’s complaint is about the Council delaying responding to her Freedom of Information request relating to her father’s social care records. She says she has concerns about the care he received leading up to his death.
  2. The Information Commissioner’s Office is best placed to consider Mrs X’s complaint. There is not a good reason for us to consider this complaint instead.
  3. Should Mrs X decide to complain about the care itself, she should do so as soon as possible. We cannot investigate late complaints (those made more than 12 months after the person becomes aware of the issue) unless we decide there are good reasons for the delay. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  4. We do not require people to gather information before bringing complaints to us, therefore awaiting records would normally not be considered a good reason for delay.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because the Information Commissioner’s Office is best placed to consider Freedom of Information requests.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings