Somerset West and Taunton Council (22 000 640)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Apr 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint about a Freedom of Information request. This is because it is reasonable for Mr B to complain to the Information Commissioner, and if needed, appeal to the tribunal.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Mr B, complains that the Council has not provided information he requested under the Freedom of Information Act. Mr B also complains that the Council has not responded to his complaint about this.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The Act says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The Information Commissioner's Office considers complaints about freedom of information. Its decision notices may be appealed to the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights). So, where we receive complaints about freedom of information, we normally consider it reasonable to expect the person to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr B.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr B may complain to the Information Commissioner about the Council not providing the information he has requested under the Freedom of Information Act. If Mr B disagrees with a decision notice issued by the Information Commissioner, Mr B may appeal to the tribunal. I find it is reasonable for Mr B to do this. It is not the role of the Ombudsman to decide whether a public body has complied with the Freedom of Information Act.
  2. Mr B also complains that the Council has not responded to his complaint. But, it is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures, if we are unable to deal with the substantive issue. So, we will not investigate this part of Mr B’s complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because it is reasonable for him to complain to the Information Commissioner, and if needed, appeal to the tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings