Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council disclosing the complainant’s personal details. This is because this matter is best dealt with by the Information Commissioner’s Office.

The complaint

1. The complainant, whom I shall refer to as Miss X, has complained the Council disclosed her details to a third party without permission. Miss X says the person the information was shared with has started a vendetta against her, destroyed her business and threatened her safety.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

2. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint,

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

3. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

4. I considered information provided by Miss X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

5. Miss X can complain to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) if she is concerned about how the Council handles her personal data. The ICO is the independent body set up to uphold information rights and is best placed to deal with Miss X’s concerns.

Back to top

Final decision

6. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because the ICO is best placed to deal with this matter.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman