Stoke-on-Trent City Council (21 013 868)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Jan 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an alleged breach of the complainant’s confidentiality. This is because another body is better placed to do so.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Ms B, complains that the Council has breached her confidentiality and has failed to respond to her subsequent complaint.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms B says she was concerned about the welfare of a third party and their children, so made a confidential referral to the Council. She complains that the Council identified her as the source of the referral. This has had a detrimental impact on Ms B’s relationship with the third party, causing her distress and potential financial loss. She made a complaint to the Council and says she has received no response.
  2. We will not investigate Ms B’s complaint because it concerns an alleged data protection breach. The Information Commissioner is better placed than the Ombudsman to consider such matters. It is open to Ms B to take the matter to the Information Commissioner and it would be reasonable for her to do so. That being the case, there is no role for the Ombudsman.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms B’s complaint because another body is better placed to do so.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings