North Yorkshire County Council (20 013 092)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Mar 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complains about the use of public funds for an advert in the media by the Council about local government reform. Mr X complains the advert was biased and could influence the consultation process which could result in the loss of his role as an elected representative. We cannot investigate as this affects all or most of the people in the Council area. The personal injustice specific to Mr X relates to his position as a member of the Council and so we cannot investigate.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the use of public funds for an advert in the media by the Council about local government reform. Mr X complains the advert was biased and could influence the consultation process which could result in the loss of his role as an elected representative.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate something that affects all or most of the people in a council’s area. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(7), as amended)
  2. We can only accept complaints from members of the public or their authorised representatives. This means we cannot accept complaints from councillors complaining about something relating to their position as a councillor. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26A, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered what Mr X said in his complaint.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr X complains about the use of public funds for an advert in the media by the Council about local government reform. Mr X complains the advert was biased and could influence the consultation process which could result in the loss of his role as an elected representative.

Analysis

  1. Complaints about Council spending impact upon all or most of the residents in the Council’s area. The law prevents us from investigating such complaints.
  2. Mr X may be affected more than other resident as he says the outcome of the consultation exercise may result in his role as an elected representative being lost. This however does not give us grounds to investigate. This is because the law says we cannot investigate complaints from Council members relating to their position as part of the Council. We can only accept complaints from members of the public and in respect of the threat to his position as a councillor, Mr X does not complain as a member of the public.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint as it affects all or most of the people in the Council’s area. In addition, Mr X’s specific injustice relates to his position as a Council member. We cannot therefore accept his complaint.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings