Surrey County Council (20 000 527)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 15 Jul 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman cannot investigate Miss B’s complaint about the Coroner’s reports and conduct. This is because the actions of the Coroner are not administrative functions of the Council’s staff.

The complaint

  1. Miss B says the Council delayed and gave wrong pathology reports about her deceased father.
  2. Miss B also says the Council did not carry out an inquest.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint where the body complained about is not responsible for the issue being raised. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(1), as amended)
  3. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered Miss B’s complaint and the Council’s response to her complaint. I issued a draft decision to Miss B and invited comments before I made my final decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Miss B says there was a delay with the Council taking her deceased father’s toxicology samples and the pathology reports were wrong.
  2. Miss B also says the Council promised to carry out an inquest, but it was not done.
  3. In response to Miss B’s complaint, the Council says the Coroner reviewed its original decision and the report remains same; Miss B’s father died from a natural cause.
  4. Coroners are independent judicial appointments and their support staff are provided by the Council. The Ombudsman cannot investigate the matters Miss B complains about because they are the Coroner’s decisions and not administrative actions of its staff.
  5. If Miss B wishes to challenge the judicial decision of the Coroner not to carry out an inquest, she could do this through a Judicial Review. Also, if Miss B remains dissatisfied and wishes to complain about other aspects of the Coroner’s conduct, she could make a complaint to the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman cannot investigate this complaint. This is because the actions of the Coroner are not administrative functions of the Council’s staff and it would be reasonable for Miss B to consider court action to challenge the Coroner’s decision.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings