Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Nottingham City Council (19 018 763)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Mar 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr D’s complaint about the conduct of staff when he attended an inquest. Further consideration of the complaint would not achieve any more for Mr D.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Mr D, complains that when he attended an inquest at the Council’s offices, the receptionist was rude and another member of staff refused to shake his hand.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
  • it is unlikely we would find fault, or
  • the fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • the injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • it is unlikely we could add to any previous investigation by the Council, or
  • it is unlikely further investigation will lead to a different outcome (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information provided by Mr D and the Council’s response to his complaints.

Back to top

What I found

  1. The Ombudsman was not present when Mr D attended the Council’s offices and can make no judgement on whether the person Mr D spoke to was rude. Mr D was also offended a member of staff did not want to shake his hand, but that was a matter of personal choice for the staff member.
  2. The Council has investigated Mr D’s complaint, spoken to the relevant members of staff about how they made Mr D feel and apologised to Mr D. There is nothing further the Ombudsman can achieve.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. Further consideration of the complaint would not achieve any more for Mr D.

Investigator’s final decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page