West Lancashire Borough Council (26 003 041)

Category : Other Categories > Leisure and culture

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 Aug 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s actions in relation to her concerns about the condition of its public park. This is because any personal injustice is not significant enough to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained the Council failed to keep its public park safe and accessible despite previously saying it would take action in response to her concerns. She said this caused her frustration and wants the Council to take effective steps to ensure the park is safe and accessible for members of the public.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X said she frequently uses the park with her dog. She said the Council leases the park to a football club. The football club has placed equipment in the park which Miss X said has affected the safety and accessibility of it. Miss X later complained that the park had also been vandalised.
  2. We usually investigate complaints where the complainant has experienced serious harm or distress as a direct result of the Council’s actions. We recognise the injustice caused to Miss X however, we do not consider it to be significant enough to warrant an investigation. Furthermore, if Miss X believes the park has been vandalised, she would need to report the matter to the Police.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because any personal injustice is not significant enough to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings