London Borough of Enfield (25 011 966)

Category : Other Categories > Leisure and culture

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Oct 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s delays in responding to a service request and complaint. This is because further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council took ten months to respond to his complaint about a request to repair a post and the surrounding grass. He said he had to chase the Council for its response, which required time and effort. Mr X wants compensation and the Council to accept accountability.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X submitted a service request to the Council in October 2024 and asked it to complete repairs on a post and surrounding grass. The Council said its initial assessment of the damage did not show a health and safety concern, and it assigned it a low priority. The Council completed the work in May 2025.
  2. Mr X complained to the Council about its communication over the repairs. The Council reviewed its contacts with Mr X, upheld his complaint, and said his requests were not properly acknowledged. The Council said it should have clearly communicated its next steps.
  3. In its complaint response the Council apologised and said it had managed Mr X’s requests poorly and would incorporate the lessons learned into staff training to prevent issues in the future. This is an appropriate response to the injustice caused to Mr X, further investigation by the Ombudsman would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings