Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (25 007 127)

Category : Other Categories > Leisure and culture

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Jul 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the information on the Council’s website about a community venue. This is because an investigation would be unable to achieve the outcome he wants.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained a community venue did not have accessible disabled facilities. He said the Council’s website advertised accessible facilities and this was false advertising. Mr X said the lack of facilities was very distressing for him and would like the venue to reimburse the person who hired the venue.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about councils and certain other bodies. We cannot investigate the actions of bodies such as community associations. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 25 and 34(1), as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X attended an event at a community venue. Mr X needs to be able to use fully accessible disabled toilet facilities. He complained the venue did not have the facilities it said it had. He said this caused him distress and, as a disabled man, he felt discriminated against. A community association manage the venue and this is not organisation we are able to investigate and we are therefore unable to consider this part of his complaint.
  2. Mr X complained the Council included information on its website showing the venue had a fully accessible facilities. The Council has apologised to Mr X and has amended the information on its website. This is an appropriate remedy for Mr X’s injustice in relation to the Council’s actions.
  3. Mr X would like the venue to agree a refund of the hire costs. But as the Council do not manage the venue this is not an outcome an investigation by us could achieve.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate complaint because investigation would be unable to achieve the outcome Mr X wants.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings