London Borough of Haringey (25 006 796)

Category : Other Categories > Leisure and culture

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Sep 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to terminate her allotment tenancy. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained about the Council’s decision to terminate her allotment tenancy. She said the Council did not properly consider her appeal. She said this has left her feeling unheard and treated unfairly.
  2. Mrs X wants the Council to withdraw the termination notice and review its processes.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council put in place an allotment agreement in January 2023 after Mrs X failed a probation period.
  2. After a site visit the Council issued a non-compliance notice in April 2024. The Council considered Mrs X’s personal circumstances and health and provided advice to use a co-worker as a temporary solution. After a further site visit the Council issued a tenancy termination letter in August 2024.
  3. Mrs X appealed the Council’s decision to terminate her allotment tenancy, and it responded via its complaints process. The Council did not uphold Mrs X’s complaint because she received two non-compliance notices within three consecutive site visits.
  4. Although Mrs X disagrees with the Council’s decision we will not investigate. The Council’s decision to terminate Mrs X’s allotment tenancy was made in line with the tenancy agreement in place and after taking Mrs X’s personal circumstances into account. As there is not enough evidence of fault in how the Council made its decision, we cannot question the outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings