London Borough of Waltham Forest (24 015 080)

Category : Other Categories > Leisure and culture

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 26 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the actions taken by the Council after she reported an incident in a park. Further investigation would achieve nothing more.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complained the Council failed to properly investigate and address safety concerns in a local park. As a result, Ms X says she is now scared to go in the park.
  2. Ms X is also unhappy with how the Council handled her complaint and says her concerns were not properly addressed.
  3. She would like the Council to investigate the park’s safety, provide staff training and pay her compensation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X was subject to an attack in a park. The matter was reported to the Police to investigate. The Council provided the Police with the details of the third party company (Company B) who managed the park to ensure any witnesses could be contacted.
  2. Ms X complained to the Council. She said it had absolved itself of its responsibility when it passed Company B’s details to the Police. She also said the park remained unsafe and Company B had failed to record the incident.
  3. The Council replied and said it had no power to investigate criminal matters which was why it had passed Company B’s details to the Police. It explained what safety measures were in place in the park and what steps it had taken to ensure Company B recorded such incidents in the future.
  4. Any investigation by us would be unlikely to achieve anything further. Therefore, we will not investigate this complaint.
  5. We will also not investigate how the Council handled Ms X’s complaint. That is because it is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures, if we are unable to deal with the substantive issue.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because further investigation would be unlikely to achieve anything more.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings