South Norfolk District Council (19 015 575)

Category : Other Categories > Leisure and culture

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 31 Jan 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s disclosure of her anonymous feedback and failure to provide her with access to information about her. This is because the Information Commissioner’s Office is the most appropriate body to consider her concerns.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains that her anonymous feedback to a Council run leisure centre was disclosed to a member of staff, in doing so revealing her identity.
  2. Miss X also complains that she has been informed by management of the leisure centre that her actions are a Health and Safety concern but will not disclose to her what these concerns are.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered Miss X’s complaint to the Ombudsman and the information she has provided. I have written to Miss X and considered her comments in response.

Back to top

What I found

  1. At the heart of Miss X’s complaint is a data protection issue. Namely, Miss X’s request for her identity not to be disclosed and her request for access to data held on her in relation to the Health and Safety matter.
  2. The ICO is the UK’s independent authority set up to uphold information rights. It promotes openness by public bodies and protects the privacy of individuals. It deals with complaints about public authorities’ failures to comply with data protection legislation. This includes disclosing information in error and access to a person’s data.
  3. There is no charge for making a complaint to the ICO and its complaints procedure is relatively easy to use. Where someone has a complaint about data protection, the Ombudsman usually expects them to bring the matter to the attention of the ICO.
  4. I consider the ICO to be in a much better position than the Ombudsman to consider Miss X’s complaint.
  5. The ICO can decide if there has been a breach of Miss X’s personal data in relation to the anonymous feedback. The ICO can also require the Council to provide information held about individuals.
  6. The ICO has much wider powers than the Ombudsman to act if it finds the Council has failed in its duties as a data controller.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. My decision is that the Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. This is because the ICO is the most appropriate body to deal with her concerns.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings