Surrey Heath Borough Council (25 002 001)

Category : Other Categories > Land

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Nov 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to sell land it owns because there is not enough personal injustice caused to Mrs X to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained about the Council’s decision to sell several plots of land it owns including one which operates as a car park for the public to use. Mrs X said she uses the car park when she attends the nearby church. Mrs X does not want the Council to sell the land.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X said she attends a church which has a private car park she can use however, Mrs X prefers to use the nearby Council-owned car park. Mrs X said the community also uses the Council-owned car park. The Council sold the car park with a condition that it continued to operate as a car park until the church car park becomes available to the public by 2026.
  2. Mrs X also said the Council should not sell two other lots of land, one of which contains protected trees.
  3. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint as there is not enough personal injustice caused to Mrs X by the Council selling its land to warrant an investigation. Furthermore, Mrs X still has access to a car park when she attends the church.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is not enough personal injustice caused to Mrs X to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings