Manchester City Council (24 009 924)

Category : Other Categories > Land

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about damage to his property caused by Council-owned trees and shrubbery. This is because it is reasonable for Mr X to submit a claim to the Council’s insurers, and if needed take the matter to court.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about damage to his fence caused by Council-owned trees and shrubbery.
  2. Mr X says he wants the Council to pay for replacement fencing and posts.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended.)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained that Council-owned trees and shrubbery were not properly maintained and had damaged his fence and fence posts due to their growth.
  2. The Council said that it had inspected the site and the damage to the fence was caused by the posts rotting and not trees or shrubbery from Council land.
  3. If he disagrees, Mr X could submit a claim to the Council’s insurers. If the claim is rejected, Mr X could take the matter to court. It is reasonable to expect Mr X to do this.
  4. The role of the Ombudsman is to consider complaints of administrative fault. We cannot decide liability in complaints about damage to property. We have no powers to compel the Council to pay for the repairs and only the courts can do this.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is reasonable for him to take the matters complained about to court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings