Essex County Council (19 004 676)

Category : Other Categories > Land

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Aug 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complained about the Council’s refusal to accept his claim of adverse possession of public highway land. The Ombudsman should not investigate this complaint. This is because it concerns a dispute land ownership which can only be determined by the courts.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Mr X, complains that the Council has rejected his claim for adverse possession of a piece of former highway land on which he has built a shed which he lives in. He is concerned that he will be evicted in due course.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered all the information which Mr X submitted with his complaint. I have also considered the Council’s response and Mr X has commented on the draft decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr X says he has occupied an area of former trunk road which has been disused for some time following road re-alignment. He has built a temporary home on the land and claimed adverse possession of the land from the highway authority. He says the Council has refused his request to obtain title of the land and is concerned that his structure may be demolished in future.
  2. The Council says that the land is still highway land and will be retained for future use by the authority. Case law has determined in recent years that adverse possession cannot apply to public highway land.
  3. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. Mr X is making a legal claim to the land and only the courts can decide land ownership.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman should not investigate this complaint. This is because it concerns a dispute land ownership which can only be determined by the courts.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings