Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Nottingham City Council (18 011 123)

Category : Other Categories > Elections and electoral register

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 29 Nov 2018

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman should not investigate this complaint about a letter issued to residents during the pre-election period, because it is unlikely we would find fault.

The complaint

  1. Ms P complains that the Council published information during the pre-election period which gave an unfair advantage to one candidate over the others.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’ relating to administrative functions of the Council. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe it is unlikely we would find fault. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered the information Ms P provided with her complaint and discussed the complaint with her. I have given Ms P the opportunity to comment on my draft decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Shortly before a local council election, the Council wrote to residents in part of the city to say it was introducing a residents’ parking scheme in the area for an experimental period. A candidate in the election then wrote to residents taking credit for this.
  2. We cannot consider what the candidate did, because the conduct of an election is a matter for the returning officer. Returning officers for local elections do not carry out administrative functions of the council. They carry out specified functions under Act of Parliament in a personal capacity, not on behalf of the council. So we cannot investigate what they do or matters which fall within their brief.
  3. The government has published a code of recommended practice for publicity which includes during pre-election periods. Councils must follow the code when considering publicity unless there is a good reason to depart from it. ‘Publicity’ is defined as any communication addressed to the public or a section of the public. So a letter issued to some of the Council’s residents during the pre-election period would need to comply with the code.
  4. The code says:

During the period between the notice of an election and the election itself, local authorities should not publish any publicity on controversial issues or report views or proposals in such a way that identifies them with any individual members or groups of members ... In general, local authorities should not issue any publicity which seeks to influence voters.

  1. The letter from the Council did not link the parking scheme to any particular candidate. So it is unlikely we could conclude it did not comply with the code or that we would find fault here.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman should not investigate this complaint. This is because we are unlikely to find fault in that part of the complaint within our jurisdiction.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page