High Peak Borough Council (25 015 514)

Category : Other Categories > Councillor conduct and standards

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision on a councillor conduct complaint as it is unlikely we will find fault in the way the Council considered the matter.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council failed to properly consider his complaint that a councillor had breached the Council’s code of conduct when they started unfounded disciplinary proceedings against him in his role as chairman of a local community group.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council assessed Mr X’s complaint. It acknowledged the councillor had used their Council email address. However it decided not to investigate as, in its view, the councillor was not acting in their official capacity as an elected member of the Council when the alleged breach of the code took place. Therefore, it decided the code of conduct was not engaged.
  1. I recognise Mr X disagrees with the Council’s view and has strong feelings about the actions of the councillor. But the Council is entitled to reach the decision it did, and it is in line with its complaint policy. We could only be critical of the decision if there was evidence of fault in the way it was made; I have not seen such evidence.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we are unlikely to find fault in the Council’s actions.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings