South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council (24 008 758)

Category : Other Categories > Councillor conduct and standards

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Dec 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of a member conduct complaint as it is reasonable to expect Mr X to ask the Council to review its decision.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council’s handling of a complaint about his conduct as a council member was procedurally flawed. Mr X says this has caused him reputational damage, and a financial cost in the form of legal fees.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide it would be reasonable for the person to ask for a council review or appeal (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council’s procedure for dealing with member conduct complaints allows a member, who has been found to have breached the Council’s code of conduct, to seek a review of that decision.
  2. Mr X made a complaint to the Council and to us, but did not specifically ask for a review of the Council’s decision. I consider the next appropriate step is for the Council to carry out that review and as such, we will not investigate. If Mr X remains dissatisfied once the review is completed, it is open to him to bring his complaint to us again. The Council has confirmed that the matters Mr X complained about can be considered in the scope of a review.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is reasonable to expect the Council to carry out a review of its decision at this stage.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings