Rother District Council (23 016 467)

Category : Other Categories > Councillor conduct and standards

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Mar 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a complaint about the conduct of councillors. We are unlikely to find fault in the way the Council considered the complaint.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s decision not to investigate his complaint that councillors breached the code of conduct. He says the councillors concerned failed to declare an interest in a local society before taking part in a vote which benefited that society.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Local Authorities have a duty to have a Monitoring Officer to ensure the legality and fairness of authority decision making. The Monitoring Officer must ensure the Council, its officers, and elected members uphold the highest standards of conduct. Each council has different rules for dealing with complaints about code of conduct breaches.
  2. The Ombudsman does not provide an appeal against the Monitoring Officer’s decision. We can only look at how the complaint was considered. We are unable to investigate or comment on the actions of the councillors complained about.
  3. In this case, the Monitoring Officer assessed the complaint. Following consultation with the Council’s Independent Person, they decided not to investigate the complaint as the meeting and the vote occurred more that six months ago. They considered whether there were any exceptional circumstances to investigate the late complaint. However, they note the councillors declared their interests and did not unduly influence the vote.
  4. I understand Mr X disagrees. But this was a decision the Monitoring Officer was entitled to make. As the they dealt with Mr X’s complaint according to the Council’s procedure for dealing with complaints about the conduct of councillors, it is unlikely I could find fault.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we are unlikely to find fault in the way the Council considered his allegation that councillors had breached the code of conduct.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings