London Borough of Brent (23 014 050)
Category : Other Categories > Councillor conduct and standards
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 29 Jan 2024
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a complaint that a councillor breached the Council’s Code of Conduct. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault with how the Council considered the complaint.
The complaint
- Ms X complains about how the Council dealt with her complaint that a councillor breached the Council’s Code of Conduct.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by the complainant.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- Councils have a duty to designate a Monitoring Officer to ensure the lawfulness and fairness of council decision making. The Monitoring Officer must ensure that the council, its officers and members maintain the highest standards of conduct. Each council has different procedures for dealing with complaints about code of conduct breaches.
- The Ombudsman does not provide an appeal against the Monitoring Officer’s decisions. We are also unable to investigate or comment on the actions of the councillors complained about. Where a decision has been made in line with the correct procedure, taking account of the relevant evidence, the Ombudsman will generally not criticise the decision, even if the complainant does not agree with it.
- In this case, I am satisfied the Monitoring Officer fully considered Mrs X’s complaint and the supporting evidence she submitted in support of it and did so in line with the Council’s procedures. In line with the procedure, the Monitoring Officer consulted with the Independent Person before making the decision not to proceed with an investigation and fully explained the reasons for this.
- Whilst I accept Ms X strongly disagrees with this decision, the Monitoring Officer was entitled to use their professional judgement in this regard. As the Monitoring Officer properly considered Ms X’s concerns, in line with the Council’s criteria for code of conduct complaints, there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council and I will therefore not investigate Ms X’s complaint.
Final decision
- We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman