London Borough of Brent (23 014 050)

Category : Other Categories > Councillor conduct and standards

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 29 Jan 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a complaint that a councillor breached the Council’s Code of Conduct. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault with how the Council considered the complaint.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains about how the Council dealt with her complaint that a councillor breached the Council’s Code of Conduct.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Councils have a duty to designate a Monitoring Officer to ensure the lawfulness and fairness of council decision making. The Monitoring Officer must ensure that the council, its officers and members maintain the highest standards of conduct. Each council has different procedures for dealing with complaints about code of conduct breaches.
  2. The Ombudsman does not provide an appeal against the Monitoring Officer’s decisions. We are also unable to investigate or comment on the actions of the councillors complained about. Where a decision has been made in line with the correct procedure, taking account of the relevant evidence, the Ombudsman will generally not criticise the decision, even if the complainant does not agree with it.
  3. In this case, I am satisfied the Monitoring Officer fully considered Mrs X’s complaint and the supporting evidence she submitted in support of it and did so in line with the Council’s procedures. In line with the procedure, the Monitoring Officer consulted with the Independent Person before making the decision not to proceed with an investigation and fully explained the reasons for this.
  4. Whilst I accept Ms X strongly disagrees with this decision, the Monitoring Officer was entitled to use their professional judgement in this regard. As the Monitoring Officer properly considered Ms X’s concerns, in line with the Council’s criteria for code of conduct complaints, there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council and I will therefore not investigate Ms X’s complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings