South Kesteven District Council (22 016 769)

Category : Other Categories > Councillor conduct and standards

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Apr 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of a complaint against a councillor as there is insufficient personal injustice caused to Mr X to warrant our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council acted vindictively in the way it dealt with complaints against a Council member. Mr X considers this was to stop the Council member from raising issues which are in the public interest. Mr X also complains the Council will not make public certain documents relating to the investigation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or there is another body better placed to consider this complaint (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. While I recognise Mr X’s concerns, I do not consider he is impacted by his complaint personally to a degree that would warrant our involvement or that this is a matter we would investigate in the public interest.
  2. The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is the UK’s independent authority on upholding information rights and is best placed to deal with the concerns Mr X has in this regard.
  3. For these reasons, we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he is not caused serious injustice from it and the ICO is best placed to decide if the Council was wrong to refuse to release certain documents.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings