London Borough of Bromley (20 006 939)

Category : Other Categories > Councillor conduct and standards

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Dec 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complained about the actions of a senior Council officer in 1996 which he says amounted to misconduct in a public office. We should not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint. This is because it concerns matters which he was aware of more than 12-months before the time period for accepting complaints.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about a senior officer using his position in 1996 to purchase his former wife’s home at a reduced price. He says the officer failed to declare a pecuniary interest at the time and later sold the property for an increased amount.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered all the information which Mr X submitted with his complaint. I have also considered the Council’s response. Mr X has been given an opportunity to comment on a draft copy of my decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr X says his former wife was forced to sell her home at a loss due to the influence of an officer who advised her she need to do so to obtain social housing. Mr X says he has been complaining since the sale, but the Council has rejected his submissions.
  2. The Ombudsman expects a complainant to complain to us within 12 months of being aware of a claimed fault by the Council. Mr X did not complain until 2020 and we will not exercise discretion to consider it now. The property was transferred to his former wife’s ownership before the sale and she did not submit a complaint to us about the officer’s actions.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We should not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint. This is because it concerns matters which he was aware of more than 12-months before the time period for accepting complaints.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings