Royal Borough of Greenwich (20 006 472)

Category : Other Categories > Councillor conduct and standards

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 25 Nov 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate how the Council decided not to pursue a complaint about the conduct of a councillor. It is unlikely he would find evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to here as Mr D, has complained the Council will not investigate his concerns about the actions of a councillor. He has complained about how the Council dealt with his subsequent complaint about the Council’s decision.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We may decide not to start an investigation if, for example, we believe it is unlikely we would find fault. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended)
  2. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3) as amended)
  3. It is not a good use of public resources to consider how a council has considered a complaint when we will not investigate the substantive issue.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered what Mr D said in his complaint including the Council’s response to his concerns. Mr D commented on a draft before I made this decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr D complained to the Council’s Monitoring Officer that a councillor had acted in a way that breached the Councillors’ Code of Conduct.
  2. The Council considered whether, if proven, the complaint would be a breach of the Code that would justify further investigation.
  3. After discussion with the Independent Person, the Monitoring Officer decided the councillor had not breached the Code of Conduct and so the Council would not investigate further.
  4. The Council’s Chief Executive, acting as Monitoring Officer, wrote to Mr D to explain the decision. I have seen no evidence of fault in how the Council made this decision and we do not provide a right of appeal against it.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I have decided we will not investigate this complaint because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council. In view of this, we will not investigate how the Council dealt with his complaint about its decision.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings