Newark & Sherwood District Council (20 004 506)

Category : Other Categories > Councillor conduct and standards

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Nov 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate how the Council decided not to pursue a complaint about the conduct of a parish councillor. It is unlikely he would find evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to here as Mr D, has complained the Council will not investigate his concerns about the actions of a parish councillor.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We may decide not to start an investigation if, for example, we believe it is unlikely we would find fault. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended)
  2. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3) as amended)
  3. We have no jurisdiction to investigate the actions of town or parish councils or their members. In a complaint such as this, about an alleged breach of the Code of Conduct by a parish councillor, we can only look at the way the Council dealt with the complaint about the alleged breach. We cannot look at the substantive complaint itself.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered what Mr D said in his complaint including the Council’s response to his concerns.

Back to top

What I found

Background

  1. The Council has responsibility for dealing with standards complaints against its own members, and against members of the parish and town councils in its area.
  2. The Council’s published arrangements on dealing with standards complaints say its Monitoring Officer considers complaints first. After consultation with an Independent Person, the Monitoring Officer decides whether a complaint merits formal investigation.

Analysis

  1. Mr D complained to the Council’s Monitoring Officer that a parish councillor had acted in a way that breached the Councillors’ Code of Conduct.
  2. After discussion with the Independent Person, the Monitoring Officer decided the councillor had not breached the Code of Conduct. The Monitoring Officer wrote to Mr D to explain the decision.
  3. I have seen no evidence of fault in how the Monitoring Officer made this decision and we do not provide a right of appeal against it.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I have decided we will not investigate this complaint because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings