Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council (19 002 444)

Category : Other Categories > Councillor conduct and standards

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Jun 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about how the Council dealt with her complaint about the conduct of a councillor. This is because it is unlikely the Ombudsman will find fault by the Council and he cannot achieve the outcome Ms X wants.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Ms X, complains about how the Council dealt with her complaint about the conduct of a councillor.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe it is unlikely we would find fault, or we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered what Ms X said in her complaint.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Ms X complained to the Council that in March 2018 a Council member posted defamatory allegations about her professional conduct on his social media page. Ms X complains that the postings caused damage to her reputation and distress and embarrassment to her and her family.
  2. Ms X wants the Council member to be reprimanded or removed from post.
  3. The Council considered Ms X’s complaint but decided not to formally investigate. It concluded that the Council member was acting in a private capacity, using his own social media page, not in an official capacity. The Council therefore decided that the code of conduct did not apply and an investigation was not warranted.

Analysis

  1. The Council considered Ms X’s complaint and reached a decision it is entitled to reach. There is no indication that there was fault in the way the Council made this decision and so we cannot question the merits of it.
  2. We cannot play any role in discipline matters and so we cannot achieve the outcome Ms X seeks.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint as it is unlikely we will find fault by the Council. In the absence of fault, we cannot question its decision not to investigate Ms X’s complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings