Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (24 020 895)

Category : Other Categories > Commercial and contracts

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 24 Apr 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about how the Council managed the lease for a public space. This is because his complaint is made late, and I see no good reason why he could not have made it sooner. I will not investigate Ms Z’s complaint because it is not about an administrative function of the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s decision-making when it leased one of its public spaces to another organisation. Mr X says the organisation he represents has been evicted from the space. Mr X also complains on behalf of Ms Z, whose child uses the services that Mr X’s company provides and will be affected by the eviction.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  3. We cannot investigate complaints about actions which are not the administrative function of a council. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(1) as amended).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X’s organisation has operated from the space for several years with the permission of the leaseholder, and he feels that they should have been given a direct tenancy with the Council at the time. I will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the handling of the lease because he has been aware of the agreement in place for several years so this complaint is made late. I see no reason why he could not have complained sooner.
  2. I will not investigate Ms Z’s complaint that her child will lose the services offered by Mr X’s organisation due to the eviction. This is because any injustice caused is as a result of the actions of the lease holder and not the Council. Therefore, the issue complained about is not an administrative function of the Council.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because his complaint is made late. I will not investigate Ms Z’s complaint because it is not about an administrative function of the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings