Gloucestershire County Council (24 019 756)

Category : Other Categories > Commercial and contracts

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Mar 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s historic complaint about unpaid charges for care provision. The complaint lies outside our jurisdiction because it is late and there are no good grounds to exercise discretion to consider this very late complaint now.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X is a Care Provider, she complains there is a large unpaid debt owed by the Council for care provision between 2011 and 2023. Mrs X says they have been corresponding with the Council on this matter for several years and it remains unresolved. She says the issue arose due to the funding system the Council had in place up until late 2022.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  3. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X complained to the Council in mid-2024 about unpaid charges for care provision for residents between 2011 and 2023.
  2. The Council told Mrs X it was unable to consider the matter as it was a historic complaint and it did not have access to the relevant charging records to enable it to consider it now. It said it would expect providers to reconcile the accounts at the end of each financial year so that any discrepancies could be raised at the time.
  3. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint. It lies outside our jurisdiction because it is late. The law says a complaint should be made to us within 12 months of the person affected first becoming aware of the matter. I see no good grounds to exercise discretion to consider this very late complaint now. Also, the difficulty the Council sets out in being able to effectively investigate the matter now would also apply to an investigation by this office.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint. It lies outside our jurisdiction because it is late and there are no good grounds to exercise discretion to consider it now.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings