Liverpool City Council (24 003 189)

Category : Other Categories > Commercial and contracts

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Jul 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint non-payment of the complainant’s invoices to the Council in relation to care services. This is because the Council disputes the amount is owed to the complainant. The parties appear to be in legal dispute and we consider the complainant could reasonably take the matter to court. The law says we cannot investigate in these circumstances.

The complaint

  1. The complainant (Mr Y) complains the Council has not paid his invoices for residents it placed in his care homes. He says the Council owes approximately £780,000 in unpaid care charges. In summary, Mr Y says non-payment by the Council has caused a financial strain on the business. As a desired outcome, he wants the Council to pay the invoiced amount immediately and with interest.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council does not accept the invoice amounts are owed. The parties appear to therefore be in legal dispute. We would normally expect someone in the complainant’s position to take the matter to court. This is because only a court can make a legal determination as to whether the amount is owed and enforce an award of damages. I consider Mr Y could reasonably take the matter to court and so the restriction I outline at paragraph two (above) applies.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because Mr Y could reasonably take the matter to court. The law says we cannot investigate in these circumstances.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings