Kent County Council (18 019 461)

Category : Other Categories > Commercial and contracts

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 02 May 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mrs X complained about the Council offering a loan for a lighting scheme which has left her school with a budget deficit when claimed energy savings were not realised. The Ombudsman cannot investigate this complaint. This is because the complaint is made on behalf of governors of a state school and it is not a body from which the Ombudsman can accept a complaint.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Mrs X, complains about the Council promoting a loan for a policy to replace existing lighting with LED energy saving fittings. She says the scheme led to a deficit each year because the predicted savings did not meet the loan costs. She wants the Council to compensate the school for the deficit created in its budget.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate complaints from public bodies. (Local Government Act 1974, section 27(1)(a), as amended) section 26(A)

We can only accept complaints from members of the public or their authorised representatives. This means we cannot accept complaints from school governors representing their school. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26A, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered all the information which Mrs X submitted with her complaint and she has been given the opportunity to comment on the draft decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mrs X says that her school was encouraged to accept a loan from the Council to fund replacement of its lighting fixtures with LED versions to save energy and reduce the carbon footprint. She says the scheme was misrepresented and that the savings from the scheme do not cover the loan costs which has left the school with an overall deficit to its budget of over £37,000.
  2. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate. One of these relates to complaints by public bodies such as boards of governors of state schools rather than individual members of the public.
  3. The complaint was made against the Council on behalf of school governors and is outside the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman cannot investigate this complaint. This is because the complaint is made on behalf of governors of a state school and it is not a body from which the Ombudsman can accept a complaint.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings