Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

City Of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (17 018 087)

Category : Housing > Private housing

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Mar 2018

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the service of an Improvement Notice. This is because Mr X had a right to appeal against the Notice but chose not to exercise that right.

The complaint

  1. Mr X says the Council served him with an Improvement Notice for a property he owns. This attracted a charge of £286.75. He says the tenants left shortly afterwards, therefore the improvements were not necessary. He wants the Council to cancel the charge.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information provided by Mr X, including the Council’s response to him. He had the opportunity to comment on the draft version of this decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. A Council has a duty under the Housing Act 2004 to act regarding hazards it finds in privately rented properties.
  2. Mr X says in May his father told the Council the tenants would shortly be leaving and the property would be put up for sale.
  3. In June, the Council issued an Enforcement Notice requiring Mr X to carry out improvement works. Mr X had a right of appeal to the Residential Property Tribunal if he disagreed with the Notice.
  4. A Council officer visited the property in July and noted the tenants were still living at the property but the improvement work had not been completed. Mr X says the tenants left the property later that month.
  5. In August, the Council sent Mr X a reminder for him to pay the outstanding amount of £286.75. Mr X says the Council has continued to chase him for payment.


  1. Where someone could get a resolution of their complaint from another body, the Ombudsman expects people to use that route. Where alternative rights of redress exist, we usually expect people to use them.
  2. Mr X had a right of appeal to the Residential Property Tribunal on the improvement notices when the Council issued it. The Council says it told Mr X about his appeal rights at the time. No appeal was made. Mr X is a landlord and I consider it was reasonable for him to have used his right of appeal to challenge the Notice.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I will not investigate this complaint. This is because Mr X had a right of appeal at the time the Improvement Notice was issued but decided not to exercise that right.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page