Surrey County Council (25 023 087)

Category : Housing > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Aug 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council failed to take appropriate steps to protect his child’s welfare. There is not enough evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council failed to take appropriate steps to ensure he and his family were able to return to their property.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X and his family, including their child, had lived abroad for some time. During this time, Mr X privately rented out their property to a tenant.
  2. The family returned to the country and wanted to live in their property. In November 2025, Mr X served the tenant with the relevant notices to begin proceedings to evict them. The tenant did not move out.
  3. Mr X complained and said the Council had failed to take appropriate action to find new accommodation for the tenant. He was also unhappy that the Council had allegedly assisted the tenant with rent. He said the Council’s actions, or lack of them, had caused damage to his child’s welfare as they could not move back into the family home and might not be able to attend the school they were enrolled at.
  4. We will not investigate this complaint. It was the decision of the family to rent the property. Mr X had a privately arranged tenancy agreement with the tenant which the Council had no involvement in. If he wishes to gain possession he can continue to take legal action.
  5. Mr X believes this is a child welfare issue. It is not unless the family becomes homeless. If that happens, they can apply to the Council. If the Council owes them a housing duty, then they will take a number of issues, including the welfare of the child, into account when deciding how to discharge that duty. However, it will still not mean the Council will intervene in the private tenancy issue between Mr X and his tenant.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings