Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (25 015 807)

Category : Housing > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 Dec 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s complaint handling regarding a potential data breach of Ms X’s personal details. This is because the substantive issue is out of our jurisdiction.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complained that when she complained to the Council about a potential data breach, it conducted a biased and improper investigation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  3. The Information Commissioner's Office considers complaints about freedom of information. Its decision notices may be appealed to the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights). So where we receive complaints about freedom of information, we normally consider it reasonable to expect the person to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X complained to the Council because she believed the Council disclosed her personal details to a council tenant.
  2. The Council investigated and told Ms X there was no evidence of a data breach.
  3. Ms X has brought her complaint to the Ombudsman because she is unhappy with the Council’s investigation. The Ombudsman will not investigate a council’s complaint handling where the substantive issues are out of jurisdiction. The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is best placed to investigate matters relating to personal data and Ms X has referred the complaint to the ICO. The Ombudsman will therefore not investigate the Council’s complaint handling.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because the substantive issue is out of our jurisdiction.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings