Worcestershire County Council (23 005 491)

Category : Housing > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 30 Aug 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint that she was not approved to act as a host for Ukrainian Refugees. That is because the Council was not responsible for that decision therefore we have no jurisdiction to investigate. We will also not investigate her complaint the Council has failed to process her subject access request. That is because it would be reasonable for Mrs X to refer her complaint to the Information Commissioner’s Office.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained the Council provided information to the Home Office that resulted in her not being able to act as a host for Ukrainian Refugees. She is unhappy with that decision as she has already acted as a host for several people. She said she has made a subject access request (SAR) of the Council to get a copy of the information it provided but it has failed to provide it.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The Information Commissioner's Office considers complaints about freedom of information. Its decision notices may be appealed to the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights). So where we receive complaints about freedom of information, we normally consider it reasonable to expect the person to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner.
  3. We cannot investigate a complaint where the body complained about is not responsible for the issue being raised. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(1), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint that she is no-longer allowed to act as a host for Ukrainian Refugees. Although the Council provided information to the Home Office about Mrs X, it was the Home Office’s decision not to approve her most recent application, not the Council. Therefore, the Council is not responsible for the matter she complains about. We have no jurisdiction to investigate complaints about the Home Office.
  2. Mrs X also complains the Council has failed to respond to her SAR. The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) deals with complaints around freedom of information. It is reasonable for Mrs X to complain to the ICO therefore we will not investigate further.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint because the Council is not responsible for the decision not to approve her as a host for Ukrainian Refugees and it would be reasonable for her to refer her complaint about her subject access request to the Information Commissioner’s Office.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings