London Borough of Bromley (22 010 126)

Category : Housing > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 15 Nov 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint about a rent advance loan from the Council in 2020. This complaint was received outside the normal 12-month period for investigating complaints. There is no evidence to suggest that Mr X could not have complained to us sooner.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the Council failing to respond to his request for it to turn a rental loan advance of £1,300 into a grant.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says he asked the Council to consider changing a rental loan which it gave him into a grant in 2020. The Council initially refused but he says an independent reviewer recommended that the loan be changed. The Council later overruled this recommendation and insisted it was a repayable loan.
  2. Mr X wrote to the Council in September 2020 and asked it to reconsider. When he did not get a suitable response he wrote again in December 2020. He did not raise the matter with us until October 2022 which is outside the 12-month period for receiving complaints. Mr X has used our service previously in 2020 and there is no evidence to suggest that he could not have complained to us sooner.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint about a rent advance loan from the Council in 2020. This complaint was received outside the normal 12-month period for investigating complaints. There is no evidence to suggest that Mr X could not have complained to us sooner.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings