Huntingdonshire District Council (19 003 731)

Category : Housing > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Jul 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr B complains about the Council’s actions concerning his requests for information made under the Freedom of Information Act and its decision to seek payment of outstanding council tax arrears for a property he does not own. The Ombudsman will not investigate the complaint because both matters fall outside our jurisdiction due to the availability of appeal rights to statutory tribunals.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to as Mr B, says the Council has failed to respond to his requests for information under the FoI legislation and that it is pursuing him and his wife for council tax arrears on a property they do not own. This is causing them a great deal of stress.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  2. The Information Commissioner's Office considers complaints about freedom of information. Its decision notices may be appealed to the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights). So where we receive complaints about freedom of information, we normally consider it reasonable to expect the person to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner.
  3. The Valuation Tribunal deals with appeals against decisions on council tax liability and council tax support or reduction.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. In considering the complaint I spoke to Mr B and reviewed the information he and the Council provided.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr B has sought information from the Council under the FoI legislation. He says some of his requests have not been answered.
  2. Mr B and his wife have received individual demands for council tax arrears for a property which had previously been rented out to a tenant who paid rent to Mr B’s wife. Mr B disputes their liability to pay the outstanding council tax for the property which is part of a long-running court dispute between Mrs B and members of her family following the death of her mother.
  3. The Council has advised that as the property is empty, and it views Mr and Mrs B as the “responsible person”, it has sought payment council tax from them.

Assessment

  1. Both parts of Mr B’s complaint fall outside our jurisdiction because of the availability of appeal rights to two statutory tribunals which we would reasonably expect him to make use of.
  2. Mr B can take matters relating to his FoI requests to the Information Commissioner and can appeal to the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights). If he, and/or his wife, dispute their liability for the council tax they can appeal to the Valuation Tribunal.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate the complaint because both matters fall outside our jurisdiction due to the availability of appeal rights to statutory tribunals.

Investigator’s final decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings