City of Wolverhampton Council (19 000 469)

Category : Housing > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 24 May 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Ms X complained about the Council’s failure to assist her in contesting the terms of the lease on her home. The Ombudsman should not investigate this complaint. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council which would warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Ms X, complains about the lack of assistance from the Council to challenge the terms of a lease which she holds with a private company. She wants the Council to help her to remove the terms which prevent her from moving to another area.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
  • it is unlikely we would find fault, or
  • it is unlikely we could add to any previous investigation by the Council, or
  • it is unlikely further investigation will lead to a different outcome, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered all the information which Ms X submitted with her complaint. I have also considered the Council’s response and Ms X has commented on the draft decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Ms X wanted the Council to help her to challenge the terms of a lease which she holds with a private equity company. The lease is a lifetime lease which she signed in exchange for 100% equity in her home. The Council has contacted solicitors on her behalf but they will not entertain the case because she is bound by the terms of the lease which she signed.
  2. The Council is providing a package of support for Ms X’s adult care needs. However, it says it is unable to assist her in what is essentially a private legal matter.
  3. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. The Council has no authority to intervene in Ms X’s lease agreement with the company.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman should not investigate this complaint. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council which would warrant an investigation.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings