North Northamptonshire Council (24 020 310)

Category : Housing > Managing council tenancies

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Apr 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about matters related to a leasehold property. The law prevents us investigating the substantive points. It would be disproportionate to investigate the Council’s complaint-handling in isolation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s actions related to a leasehold property his relative, and then the relative’s estate, used to own.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate complaints about the management of housing let on a long lease by a council that is a registered social housing provider. (Local Government Act 1974, paragraph 5B, schedule 5, as amended)
  3. The courts have said we can decide not to investigate a complaint about any action by an organisation concerning a matter which the law says we cannot investigate. (R (on the application of M) v Commissioner for Local Administration [2006] EHWCC 2847 (Admin))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and copy correspondence from the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council is a registered provider of social housing. Mr X is the executor of a deceased relative’s estate. He is dealing with the Council because his relative owned a residential leasehold of a property where the Council was the freeholder. The estate no longer owns the lease.
  2. The legal restriction in paragraph 3 prevents us looking into matters ‘in connection with’ the Council’s management of the leasehold. Mr X’s complaint to us includes the Council’s actions about invoices and payments, whether the Council took payments it should not have to, whether the Council has acted in line with the relevant law and the Council’s alleged failure to address fundamental questions about these points. All the points complained of are ‘in connection with’ the Council’s management of the lease, even if some of the events were after the lease ended. Therefore we cannot investigate the substantive complaint.
  3. Mr X also complains about how the Council dealt with his complaints about the above matters. It would be disproportionate to seek to investigate the Council’s complaint-handling when we cannot consider the substantive points complained of. So, for the reason given in paragraph 4, we will not investigate the Council’s complaint-handling.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. The law prevents us investigating the substantive matters. In that context, it would be disproportionate to investigate the Council’s complaint-handling.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings