Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (25 022 934)

Category : Housing > Homelessness

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to discharge its homelessness duty. It was reasonable for Ms X to use the review and appeal procedure available under the homelessness legislation.

The complaint

  1. Ms X says the council unreasonably closed her homelessness application when she refused an offer of temporary accommodation which she says was unsuitable. She says that she has been left with no accommodation and that her hosing register application was also ended when she refused the offer.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has started court action about the matter. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council’s response.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X says the Council closed her homelessness case and her housing application when she refused to accept an offer of temporary accommodation in 2025. She says the accommodation was unsuitable for her needs due to her family circumstances. The Council advised her to accept the accommodation and then submit a review of suitability request but she rejected the offer and instead it discharged its homelessness duty.
  2. Ms X submitted a review request under s.202 of the Housing Act 1996 part 7 to challenge the decision to discharge the homelessness duty. The review was not upheld and she lodged an appeal at the County Court under s.204 of the legislation.
  3. We cannot investigate complaints where there was a right of appeal to a court or a tribunal available and the complainant has exercised that right.
  4. Ms X’s housing application was cancelled when she refused the Council’s accommodation offer and moved in with her daughter. When an applicant’s housing circumstances change they are normally required to submit a change in circumstances application which reflects their new housing situation. She would need to inform the Council of her new housing circumstances and whether a new application is required.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to discharge its homelessness duty. It was reasonable for Ms X to use the review and appeal procedure available under the homelessness legislation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings