Manchester City Council (25 011 732)

Category : Housing > Homelessness

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Jan 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about poor communication and missed payments from the Council to Mrs X, regarding her son’s homelessness application. This is because further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains she was unable to contact her son’s social worker for two months after he made his homelessness application.
  2. She complains the Council failed to give her payments as promised for continuing to accommodate him.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

  1. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X complained about the matters set out above in paragraphs 1 and 2.
  2. In the complaint response the Council apologised for the lack of response from the social worker. It upheld the complaints and said it would ensure payments were made.
  3. This is a proportionate remedy for the distress caused to Mrs X. It is also in line with our Guidance on Remedies. An investigation would not achieve more for Mrs X.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings