Southend-on-Sea City Council (25 011 441)

Category : Housing > Homelessness

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Jan 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s offer of accommodation under its homelessness duty which Miss X says is unsuitable for her needs. It was reasonable for Miss X to ask for a suitability review of her accommodation offer and to appeal against any outcome which was unfavourable.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained about the Council’s offer of permanent accommodation. She says the property offered is in a tower block and she is already in similar temporary accommodation which she believes is not suitable for her child’s needs. If she refuses the offer she is concerned that the Council was discharge its homelessness duty.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide it would be reasonable for the person to ask for a council review or appeal (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council’s responses.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X says she has been offered permanent accommodation by the Council to end her stay in temporary accommodation under its homelessness duty. She says that she needs a ground floor flat or a house with a private garden for her son’s health needs.
  2. The Council says she does not meet medical needs requirements for such properties and that following an assessment by an occupational therapist the offer of a flat is suitable. If she wishes to challenge the offer she could accept it and then ask for a review of suitability under s.202 of the Housing Act 1996. If she is unsuccessful she will have further rights of appeal tot the County Court under s.204.
  3. We cannot determine if the offer is suitable and any review will require any medical evidence to be considered as part of the procedure. It is reasonable for Miss X to ask for a review. If the Council discharges its homelessness duty Miss X will have rights to have this decision reviewed or appeal also.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s offer of accommodation under its homelessness duty which Miss X says is unsuitable for her needs. It was reasonable for Miss X to ask for a suitability review of her accommodation offer and to appeal against any outcome which was unfavourable.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings