Telford & Wrekin Council (25 005 859)

Category : Housing > Homelessness

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Sep 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to end the main housing duty when Mr X was homeless. It was reasonable for Mr X to use his statutory right of appeal to the county court. It is open to him to ask the court for permission to make a late appeal.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council wrongly ended its main housing duty, saying he had refused a final offer of accommodation. Mr X said he accepted the property, and it was the Council that had withdrawn the offer.
  2. Mr X said the Council’s actions have left him homeless and meant he missed the opportunity to accept two other offers. He wanted the Council to accommodate his family.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says he accepted a final offer of accommodation from the Council to relieve his homelessness. Mr X says that given he had accepted an offer, he refused two subsequent offers. He says the Council then withdrew the first offer, and ended the main housing duty.
  2. Mr X asked the Council to review its decision to end the main housing duty. The Council issued a review response. This explained Mr X’s statutory right of appeal to the county court within 21 days.
  3. Where someone has a statutory right of appeal, we will not normally consider the matter instead. Mr X was aware of his right of appeal. Legal aid is available for this process, and the courts are best placed to consider such matters. We are not an appeal body, and there is not a reason for us to consider the matter instead.
  4. The court has discretion to consider a late appeal. It is open to Mr X to apply to the court to permission to make a late appeal.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it was reasonable for him to use his statutory right of appeal to the county court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings