London Borough of Tower Hamlets (25 002 073)

Category : Housing > Homelessness

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 29 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the suitability of Mr X’s temporary accommodation. He successfully used his right to request a review, and the Council agreed to offer the family alternative temporary accommodation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council provided unsuitable temporary accommodation for his family. He said due to this, their property was mouldy, and their household was overcrowded, affecting his family’s health. Mr X wants the Council to provide alternative accommodation and provide financial compensation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or
  • there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained the Council’s provision of temporary accommodation for his family was unsuitable. We will normally not investigate such complaints, as the suitability of temporary accommodation can be ultimately appealed to the county court on a point of law. This is usually the appropriate route to challenge such a decision.
  2. However, in this case it is not reasonable to expect Mr X to use his right of appeal. This is because the Council has accepted the accommodation it provided is unsuitable and has moved the family to alternative temporary accommodation.
  3. There is no meaningful outcome we could achieve by investigating the matter further. Mr X successfully used the statutory process available to challenge the suitability of the temporary accommodation provided. We could not achieve the compensation Mr X seeks, because we are not investigating the substantive complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he successfully used his right to request a review and the Council agreed to provide the family alternative temporary accommodation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings