London Borough of Tower Hamlets (25 002 073)
Category : Housing > Homelessness
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 29 Jun 2025
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the suitability of Mr X’s temporary accommodation. He successfully used his right to request a review, and the Council agreed to offer the family alternative temporary accommodation.
The complaint
- Mr X complained the Council provided unsuitable temporary accommodation for his family. He said due to this, their property was mouldy, and their household was overcrowded, affecting his family’s health. Mr X wants the Council to provide alternative accommodation and provide financial compensation.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
- We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
- we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or
- there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.
(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- Mr X complained the Council’s provision of temporary accommodation for his family was unsuitable. We will normally not investigate such complaints, as the suitability of temporary accommodation can be ultimately appealed to the county court on a point of law. This is usually the appropriate route to challenge such a decision.
- However, in this case it is not reasonable to expect Mr X to use his right of appeal. This is because the Council has accepted the accommodation it provided is unsuitable and has moved the family to alternative temporary accommodation.
- There is no meaningful outcome we could achieve by investigating the matter further. Mr X successfully used the statutory process available to challenge the suitability of the temporary accommodation provided. We could not achieve the compensation Mr X seeks, because we are not investigating the substantive complaint.
Final decision
- We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he successfully used his right to request a review and the Council agreed to provide the family alternative temporary accommodation.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman